 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Camargo v. Tjaarda Dairy, No. S088632.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dairy that hired trucking company was not liable for the company's failure to determine whether their employee was qualified to operate a tractor safely. Peculiar risk doctrine applied so hirer was not liable for contractor's negligent hiring.
|
|||||
| Grant v. Superior Court, No. H021901.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely peremptory challenge filed 11 days before case management conference; no all purpose assignment, trial, or hearing was pending where court would rule on issue of law or fact.
|
|||||
| People v. Masloski, No. S088091.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After judge refused to sentence defendant to low term because she failed to appear for sentencing, she could not withdraw plea. "Cruz waiver" stating that a longer sentence could be imposed if she did not appear was part of plea agreement.
|
|||||
| People v. Vasquez, No. S085584.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 5, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vacated child sexual abuse conviction in Texas was properly admitted in SVPA civil commitment proceeding; Texas statute did not erase felony, but only restored civil rights, so civil restrictions could be imposed on defendant to protect public.
|
|||||
| In re Carrie M., No. B146015, No. B148362.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother was entitled to seek review of termination order by petition for writ of habeas corpus based on ineffective assistance of counsel because the termination order was not final and the petition was filed concurrently.
|
|||||
| Foxgate Homeowners Ass'n v. Bramalea Cal., No. S087319.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court erred in creating bad faith exception to statutes governing confidentiality of mediation communications; exception was inconsistent with unambiguous statutes and policy favoring mediation.
|
|||||
| People v. Buckhalter, No. S086220.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant serving indeterminate life sentence was not eligible to earn prison worktime credits for period when he was confined in county jail to permit his appearance in sentencing remand proceedings. Trial court could recalculate credits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
