|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - June 5, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
In re Angel R., G039120,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 5, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Stickers discovered in a minor's shoe fell within definition of an implement as proscribed by Pen. Code, ? 594.2, subd. (c)(2), because they could be used quickly to mark surfaces without the time expenditure that either painting or writing would require; four stickers were adhesive-backed letters constituting the monogram of minor's tagging crew.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Darlene T., B200176,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The juvenile court did not have authority under Welf. & Inst. Code, ? 362, subd. (a), to order a county social services agency to make retroactive Aid to Families with Dependent Children - Foster Care payments to a maternal grandmother without an administrative determination of eligibility.
|
|
| |
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Great American Ins. Co., B189133,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a school construction dispute, the trial court erred by not provisionally considering extrinsic evidence proffered for the purpose of determining whether contractual language was reasonably susceptible to the contractor's interpretation, as authorized under the parol evidence rule codified at Civ. Code, ? 1625, and Code Civ. Proc., ? 1856.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback