 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baker v. Gourley, No. E025915.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No substantial evidence supported finding that the integrity of plaintiff's blood sample compromised when its seal cut six days before being tested or that official standards not observed such that the sample was compromised.
|
|||||
| ECC Constr. v. Ganson, No. B132155.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in contract action affirmed where homeowners were not liable to plaintiff for any wrongful conduct related to payments due under construction contract; plaintiff lost ability to enforce mechanic's lien by failing to apportion.
|
|||||
| Kasler v. Lockyer, No. S069522.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Against taxpayers' challenges, the court upheld the constitutionality of the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989; the statute did not violate equal protection, separation of powers doctrine, or due process concerns.
|
|||||
| People v. Rios, No. S055790.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The People were not required to affirmatively prove the elements of provocation or imperfect self-defense in order to convict a defendant of voluntary manslaughter.
|
|||||
| Pullin v. Superior Court, No. B139532.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nothing in the Civil Discovery Act prevented petitioner's expert witness from conducting a lawful, unilateral investigation without resort to statutory discovery device. Trial court's order excluding evidence was vacated.
|
|||||
| Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, No. B123085.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tort action against ex-husband, alleging fraud and perjury for falsely disclaiming any community assets, was not time-barred where evidence showing such assets did not exist at time of divorce action.
|
|||||
| Shvarts v. Budget Group, No. B126504.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action because defendant's fuel service charge was not unconscionable, unfair, or fraudulent, and no action for quasi-contract would lie where there was an existing valid express contract.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
