|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - July 30, 2002
|
| |
Armenta v. Superior Court, No. B157775.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2002, Decided , July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Two parties retained experts and obtained expert materials for the purpose of their action against certain companies; one party did not have the right to waive the other party's work product privilege to the materials.
|
|
| |
City of Ripon v. Sweetin, Nos. C036592, C037212.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2002, Decided , July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court erred in submitting to the jury evidence of a city's allegedly unreasonable pre-condemnation conduct because this was a matter for the court, and property owners were not entitled to an adjudication on the issue because they waived it.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Ryan D., No. C035092.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2002, Decided , July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where minor painted picture depicting minor shooting officer in back of head, minor turned it in as class project, and court held minor made criminal threat, evidence failed to establish minor intended to convey threat to officer.
|
|
| |
Julian v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co., B149088,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where insureds lost suit against insurer for breach of contract, policy contained exclusion for several possible efficient proximate causes of loss, and regardless of which cause was proximate cause, insurer did not owe benefits to insureds.
|
|
| |
Neal v. Health Net, Inc., No. B153290.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 30, 2002, Decided , July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Under California law, disqualification was inappropriate for mere exposure by an attorney to confidential information.
|
|
| |
Park Terrace Limited v. Teasdale, No. G029283.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 30, 2002, Decided , July 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where partner and real estate broker acted on behalf of other partners when negotiating loans for real estate investment, the requirement that the broker "arranged" the loan was satisfied and lenders were exempt from statutory usury limitations.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback