 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arreola v. County of Monterey, No. H021339.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 25, 2002, Decided , June 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Liability of state, counties, and agencies for inverse condemnation, dangerous condition of public property, and nuisance as to flood over levees and upriver from highway, was upheld. Counties' policy had been to no longer fully clear channel.
|
|||||
| Bridgestone Corp. v. Superior Court, No. B151190.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 25, 2002, Decided , June 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A Japanese tire manufacturer was subject to the jurisdiction of California courts by purposefully availing itself of the benefits of conducting activities in California by selling its products to a California distributor for resale in California.
|
|||||
| Espresso Roma Corp. v. Bank of America, No. A095229.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 25, 2002, Decided , June 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A commercial bank which exercised reasonable commercial practices in its payment of forged checks drawn on a customer's account was not responsible for the loss.
|
|||||
| Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., No. A094975.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 25, 2002, Decided , June 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because consumers' label claims against manufacturers would have resulted in the establishment of state regulations that were different from federal regulations on the subject, the claims were preempted by federal law.
|
|||||
| New Plumbing Contractors, Inc. v. Edwards, Sooy & Byron, No. G028568.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 25, 2002, Decided , June 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plumbing contractor failed to prove that the law firm hired by its liability insurer to defend a construction defect case was the cause of any harm the contractor may have suffered where the insurer settled the case on counsel's recommendation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
