 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blue v. Bonta, No. A096577.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where legislature authorized coverage for durable medical equipment, Department lacked authority to restrict scope of that coverage by its new emergency regulation, and Department was obligated to provide coverage for stair lift.
|
|||||
| Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd., No. E030224.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certain erotic dancing violated a regulation that prohibited such dancing in places that served liquor. This did not offend constitutional principles, as other reasonable avenues for such communication were available elsewhere.
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Rehrig Internat., Inc., No. C037622.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a second negligence suit based on the same incident, the trial court should not have granted the minor's motion for new trial, as there was privity between the parties, and any error in the company's closing argument was harmless error.
|
|||||
| Gentry v. Ebay, Inc., No. D037661.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An interactive service provider was immunized from suit for failing to furnish a certificate of authenticity to persons who purchased autographed sports-related collectibles through its web site.
|
|||||
| Golden Eagle Ins. Co. v. Insurance Co. of the West, No. D038580.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As all three insurers assumed risk related to insured, indemnitor, in connection with its indemnity agreements, all three insurers were liable for attorney fees and costs of indemnitee.
|
|||||
| Hackett v. John Crane, Inc., A092213, A093411,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Heidary v. Yadollahi, No. G026035.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Default judgment entered against certain individuals was void, as trial court had no power to enter judgment against them for failing to appear at trial, of which they had no notice.
|
|||||
| In re Daniel H., No. E030881.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of the mother's parental rights was affirmed because the issues that the mother raised on appeal all involved sibling visitation and the mother did not have standing to raise the issues because they did not involve her parental rights.
|
|||||
| In re Walton, No. B153201.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, June 26, 2002, Decided , June 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although petitioner was ill and more than 25 years passed since State tried to extradite him, petitioner's health was irrelevant to State's right to extradition, as there were no special circumstances that challenged that right.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
