 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Superior Court, No. B189637,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a nonparticipating coinsurer's duty to defend was undisputed and the settlements reached by settling insurers in underlying actions were by law presumptively reasonable, the nonparticipating coinsurer had the burden of proving the absence of actual coverage.
|
|||||
| Teichert Construction v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., C050709,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 1592, subd. (e), was not impermissibly vague; it put businesses on notice that they had to control hauling and earth moving operations in manner to ensure operators knew worker's location on foot within operators' immediate vicinity. Simply informing them that workers would be in general area did not satisfy requirement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
