 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Californians for Scientific Integrity v. Regents of the University of California, C028522,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no violation of First Amendment rights where plaintiff objected to spending public funds on a view that it did not endorse, and defendant's activities were within the statutory mandate to promote a smoke-free environment.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. Westbrook Torrey Hills, No. D033909.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prevailing plaintiff was entitled to recover expenses incurred in making cash deposit to court in lieu of bond; deposit and bond were to be treated as equivalents, thus since costs of bond were recoverable, so were costs of deposit.
|
|||||
| Manibog v. Mediaone of L.A., No. B132198.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cable operator could not charge a delinquency fee in excess of statutory limit of $ 4.75, irrespective of whether part of that sum was designated as a franchise fee. Grant of summary judgment was therefore reversed.
|
|||||
| People v. Miller, H017020,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fresno County Dep't of Social Services v. Sonia C. (in Re Brison C.), No. F034257.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a juvenile dependency proceeding, Department of Social Services failed to prove that a child subject to a custody battle was emotionally disturbed to such a degree that he would come within the court's dependency jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Kitzig v. Nordquist, No. D030320.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dental malpractice action, the statute of limitations did not begin to run when plaintiff consulted with a second dentist during her ongoing dentist-patient relationship with defendant.
|
|||||
| Md. Casualty Co. v. Andreini & Co., No. B124064.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legislature's view that a petition for writ of mandate was the preferred means of reviewing good faith settlement determinations did not foreclose postjudgment review by way of appeal.
|
|||||
| Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., A084367, A084371,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
