 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clark v. American Residential Services LLC, B203476,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, July 6, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Approval of a class action settlement was an abuse of discretion because the trial court made no independent inquiry before accepting class counsel's conclusion that an overtime claim had no value, because large incentive awards to named plaintiffs lacked a basis in the record, and because the award of costs exceeded the maximum specified amount.
|
|||||
| People v. Rogers, S064337,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 6, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err under the Fourth Amendment in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized from storage rooms below his apartment where exigent circumstances justified a police detective's warrantless entries into the rooms.
|
|||||
| J.C. Penney Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., C059760,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 7, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employer failed to object to a medical determination that an employee was temporarily totally disabled, the employer could not, after the time prescribed under Lab. Code, § 4062, subd. (a), object to that opinion for purposes of obtaining a credit against permanent disability payments.
|
|||||
| People v. Ramon, F054603,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 7, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Expert's testimony that possession of a stolen vehicle and an unregistered firearm could enable other crimes to benefit a gang was insufficient to support an enhancement under Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1). Defendant did not commit two separate crimes under Pen. Code, § 12031, subd. (a), by carrying an unregistered firearm as a gang member.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
