 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hansen v. Aero. Def. Related Indus. Dist., No. B135132.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The consolidated cases of the former employees of a labor union suing the labor union for wrongful discharge were dismissed because the cases were preempted by federal law.
|
|||||
| In re Santos Y., B144822,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: ICWA and similar state statute were unconstitutional as applied to minor who bonded with foster parents and had merely a quantum of Indian blood to connect to tribe, as there was no Indian family to preserve. Tribe waived placement preference.
|
|||||
| Klajic v. Castaic Lake Water Agency, No. B137258.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The agency had the right to sell water at retail only pursuant to written contract with another entity, and the entity had to remain separate and subject to regulation by the Public Utilities Commission during the life of the contract.
|
|||||
| People v. Solis, No. B142250.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions of arson and terrorist threats, but the trial court erred in imposing two enhancements for the prior conviction.
|
|||||
| Simpson v. Superior Court, No. BS069127,
APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, July 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of mandate was granted as meritorious where trial court erred in denying application for waiver of court fees and in failing to hold hearing as required by California Rules of Court before denying application.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
