|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - August 9, 2002
|
| |
Coachella Valley Mosquito v. City of Indio, No. E029531.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, August 9, 2002, Decided , August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Jurisdiction over appellants' cross-complaints was never completed and as the cross-complaints filed in response to a reverse validation action did not survive after the primary action was dismissed because of failure to serve it properly.
|
|
| |
Cumming v. City of San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency, No. E030566.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, August 9, 2002, Decided , August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Homeowners challenge to the sale of redevelopment agency land to an industrial recycler without a new environmental impact report was untimely where the petition for a writ of mandate was filed more than 180 days after the sale was approved.
|
|
| |
Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Harcros Pigments, No. A090932. , Nos. A091716, A093126.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, August 9, 2002, Decided , August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the jury considered inadmissible evidence concerning development plans for condemned property and the redevelopment agency's purchases of neighboring properties to establish the condemned property's value, the judgment was reversed.
|
|
| |
People v. Valadez, D030982, D036313,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant, who was sentenced to a prison term of 24 years to life, was denied due process, where the information did not give notice to defendant that sentencing was sought pursuant to California's "One Strike" Law.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, No. G028121.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, August 9, 2002, Decided , August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Law firms were not entitled to summary judgment on legal malpractice claim under judgmental immunity doctrine due to lack of evidence their advice was based on informed judgment, but summary judgment was proper under statute of limitations.
|
|
| |
White v. Superior Court, No. M314780A,
APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN LUIS OBISPO, August 9, 2002, Decided , August 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Writ of mandate was denied because there was no statutory privilege preventing disclosure of the inspector general's records and the inspector's interest in maintaining confidentiality was protected by the order for an in camera inspection.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback