Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - June 1, 2007

  
Fergus v. Songer, No. B182525, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc., G035681, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc., G035681, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an employment discrimination action, the employees were deprived of a fair trial because of the judge's misconduct, which included using signs to respond to objections and a soccer-style red card to stop the employees' lawyer from talking. The behaviour was the antithesis of the decorum required by Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, canon 3(B)(4).

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Alexis B. v. Mark B., G037666, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College Dist., B188077, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an employment discrimination case by a college employee, summary judgment should not have been granted for the college under the one-year statute of limitations in Gov. Code, ? 12960, subd. (d), because there was a fact question as to whether the limitation for filing an administrative claim was equitably tolled by the college's internal review.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Tripp, F049845, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Discovery of methamphetamine on a nightstand in a bedroom that defendant shared with his girlfriend, while sufficient to prove defendant's constructive possession of the drug, was insufficient to prove that he knew of its nature as a controlled substance. Therefore, defendant's conviction for possession of methamphetamine was reversed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top