 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc., G035681,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc., G035681,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employment discrimination action, the employees were deprived of a fair trial because of the judge's misconduct, which included using signs to respond to objections and a soccer-style red card to stop the employees' lawyer from talking. The behaviour was the antithesis of the decorum required by Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, canon 3(B)(4).
|
|||||
| In re Alexis B. v. Mark B., G037666,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College Dist., B188077,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employment discrimination case by a college employee, summary judgment should not have been granted for the college under the one-year statute of limitations in Gov. Code, ¿ 12960, subd. (d), because there was a fact question as to whether the limitation for filing an administrative claim was equitably tolled by the college's internal review.
|
|||||
| People v. Tripp, F049845,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Discovery of methamphetamine on a nightstand in a bedroom that defendant shared with his girlfriend, while sufficient to prove defendant's constructive possession of the drug, was insufficient to prove that he knew of its nature as a controlled substance. Therefore, defendant's conviction for possession of methamphetamine was reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
