 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, No. E024244.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's appeal moot because city did not have jurisdiction to require environmental report because no discretionary approval involved, but finding that no increased likelihood of landslide existed was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| In re Kelly D., No. C033867.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was entitled to a status review hearing when he challenged agency's proposed modification in visitation. Juvenile court's denial of hearing was a miscarriage of justice. Father entitled to notice and to argue case.
|
|||||
| McCullah v. S. Cal. Gas Co., No. B136358.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disability discrimination in employment cases were unsuitable for certification as class actions because of the highly fact-specific determinations regarding disability that had to be made in every individual case.
|
|||||
| People v. Giardino, No. E023991.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In rape by intoxication case, trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to explain to jury the meaning of "prevented from resisting," as there was evidence victim was not so intoxicated as to be deprived of reasonable judgment.
|
|||||
| People v. Jones, No. B133543.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Store employees were all subjected to force or fear and had a sufficient possessory interest in their employer's property to be the victims of attempted robbery.
|
|||||
| State Bd. of Equalization v. Woo, No. A088646.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taxpayer wife was precluded from using a fraudulent transmutation of community property to separate assets to avoid her husband's tax debt.
|
|||||
| Streit v. Covington & Crowe, No. E023862.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer and his firm that specially appeared as courtesy for plaintiff's counsel had an attorney-client relationship, and therefore owed plaintiff a duty of care, so summary judgment in malpractice action was reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
