 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Forbes v. County of San Bernardino, No. E030207.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of the State's demurrer to the estate's cause of action for spoliation of evidence was affirmed because the State was immune from suit; there was no tort remedy for negligent or intentional spoliation of evidence.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Romero, No. E030759.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was error to deny husband's motion to modify his spousal support obligations, since court was precluded from any direct or indirect consideration of subsequent spouse's or nonmarital partner's income in determining or modifying spousal support.
|
|||||
| People v. Beeson, No. E029397.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's continued involuntary treatment as a mentally disordered offender was supported by the testimony of the staff psychiatrist at the mental hospital where defendant received his treatment indicating he could not be kept in remission.
|
|||||
| People v. Cochran, No. S099260.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant used his nine-year-old daughter to produce pornography and posted it on Internet to induce others to trade pornography, posting child pornography on Internet satisfied requirements for employing minor to produce child pornography.
|
|||||
| People v. Farell, No. S092183.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute which required the imposition of a minimum county jail sentence as a condition of probation upon conviction of certain theft offenses applied to the theft of property other than money, which included trade secrets.
|
|||||
| People v. Hunter, No. C034939.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's denial of defendant's motion for discovery of information about the confidential informant upon whom officers relied in obtaining a search warrant that uncovered incriminating evidence against defendant was not cognizable on appeal.
|
|||||
| People v. Romero, No. E030010.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence of 25 years to life, under California's Three Strikes law, for felony petty theft, did not constitute cruel or unusual punishment.
|
|||||
| Upland Anesthesia Medical Group v. The Doctors' Co., No. E029969.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 11, 2002, Decided , July 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical group was not entitled to an insurance defense or coverage for the class action as there was no identified ambiguity in the insurer's policy and the class action was not negligence-based, and therefore not subject to coverage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
