Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - August 13 - August 14, 2002

  
Bay World Trading, Ltd. v. Nebraska Beef, Inc., No. A095036., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, August 13, 2002, Decided , August 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court had inherent power to amend its statement of decision to award prejudgment interest where judgment had not yet been entered.

Search Cases for Free

  
Casterson v. Superior Court, No. H023369., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 13, 2002, Decided , August 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A student's claim against a public school teacher for injuries he sustained during a school field trip was barred by the school field trip immunity statute.

Search Cases for Free

  
Herberg v. California Institute of the Arts, No. B148834., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, August 13, 2002, Decided , August 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where employee sued school for sexual harassment, alleging display of students' drawing created hostile work environment, alleged harassment was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter conditions of employment or create hostile environment.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Marriage of Lynn, No. F038161., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 13, 2002, Decided , August 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a family law matter, the trial court erred by failing to consider statutory factors and a discharged property settlement in determining the husband's support obligation.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Bernal, No. B154169., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, August 13, 2002, Decided , August 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and causing great bodily injury, and he was required to pay the victim restitution, the written release the victim gave defendant's insurance carrier did not bar restitution.

Search Cases for Free

  
Friends of East Willits Valley v. County of Mendocino, No. A094872., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 14, 2002, Decided , August 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A county's decision to set aside agricultural use restrictions on land for the purpose of building low-income homes for Native Americans was supported by substantial evidence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Guillory v. Superior Court, A096442, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Nairne v. Jessop-Humblet, No. D038803., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, August 14, 2002, Decided , August 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Beneficiary's proposed complaint, that alleged that the trustee and her late husband had orally agreed to give certain property to him so that property should not have been included in a family trust, would violate the no contest clause of the trust.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Jones, No. H022634., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 14, 2002, Decided , August 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute requiring sex offender registration did not violate equal protection concerns.

Search Cases for Free

  
Pfeiffer Venice Properties v. Bernard, No. B152966., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 14, 2002, Decided , August 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in determining that, having dismissed plaintiff's action at hearing on defendants' SLAPP motion, it was without jurisdiction to award defendants attorney fees; defendants were entitled to ruling on merits of their motion.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top