 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baltayan v. Estate of Getemyan, No. B136807.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because out-of-state plaintiff's showing of indigency was weak, trial court did not err in denying relief from security order, but it did abuse its discretion in later dismissing the case after he was granted in forma pauperis status.
|
|||||
| Donovan v. Rrl Corp., No. S082570.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mistake in the advertised price of a used automobile provided a basis for allowing the automobile dealer to rescind the offer.
|
|||||
| Finegan v. County of L.A., No. B134878.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical evidence acquired after nurse was removed from position in psychiatric ward due to physical inability to perform his job was properly admitted to rebut his showing on prima facie element of his ability to perform his job under FEHA.
|
|||||
| German v. Superior Court, No. B148154.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In limited procedural circumstance, defendant could not be retried on remand for conspiracy to commit murder where he had been impliedly been acquitted of that crime by jury that convicted him of conspiracy to commit second degree murder.
|
|||||
| Montenegro v. Diaz, No. S090699.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a child custody dispute, the trial court properly applied the best interest standard.
|
|||||
| People v. Reeves, No. A078462.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: DNA evidence was properly used to convict appellant of several burglaries and sexual offenses; the procedures used in admitting the DNA evidence had gained general acceptance in the scientific community.
|
|||||
| People v. Youngblood, No. C033929.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant charged with felony animal cruelty was not entitled to a jury instruction on the defense of necessity.
|
|||||
| Placer Ranch Partners v. County of Placer, No. C032561.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported county's decision to create a one-mile buffer area around its landfill, as the restriction was a valid exercise of the county's police powers.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
