 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| John B. v. Superior Court, S128248,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which a wife alleged that her husband had negligently infected her with HIV, discovery of the husband's medical records and previous sexual conduct was limited because the husband had a negative HIV test, which restricted the window period of possible infection to the six month period preceding the negative test.
|
|||||
| People v. Reed, S136345,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of three weapons charges arising from a single act, even if a lesser included offense was involved under the accusatory pleading test, because under Pen. Code, § 954, only a statutorily lesser included offense was subject to the bar against multiple convictions in the same proceeding.
|
|||||
| Singleton v. United States Gypsum Co., B184623,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, July 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Male employee presented material issues of fact for his hostile-workplace sexual harassment claim under Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (j), because he testified in his deposition that two male workers continuously made comments about performing sexual acts with him and that he complained to supervisors every night. The motive did not have to be sexual.
|
|||||
| Greer v. Buzgheia, C049444,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which plaintiff sued defendant for damages arising from an automobile accident, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of the full amount of plaintiff's billed medical expenses; such evidence gave the jury a more complete picture of the extent of plaintiff's injuries.
|
|||||
| Hess Collection Winery v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd., C045405,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Private mediator's decision that determined the terms of contract by which agricultural employer and union would be bound, pursuant to Lab. Code, § 1164 et seq., after the parties failed to agree on the terms of an initial collective bargaining agreement was upheld because Lab. Code, § 1164 et seq., did not violate due process or equal protection.
|
|||||
| R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc., G032371,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
