 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ford v. Superior Court, No. A094667.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant cooperated fully with police until he confessed to hitting his niece, police could reasonably rely on his apparent consent; thus confession was not fruit of an illegal arrest, and denial of suppression motion was proper.
|
|||||
| Glendale Mem'l Hosp. & Health Ctr. v. State Dep't of Mental Health, No. B127829.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where private hospitals challenged decision of California Department of Mental Health denying reimbursement for psychiatric care to Medi-Cal patients, case was remanded for department of mental health to make new findings.
|
|||||
| Hanson v. Superior Court, No. C037518.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order holding an attorney in contempt of court was not subject to annulment for its mere failure to set out facts in its support.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Petropoulos, No. H020650.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment to statute providing for reimbursement for spousal support overpayments was intended to correct previous mistake, so it could be applied retroactively. Reference was not unauthorized delegation of judicial power; sanctions were proper.
|
|||||
| In re Nicholas H., A092188, A093477,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a juvenile dependency proceeding, the trial court erroneously applied a presumption that mother's boyfriend qualified as a presumed father even though he admitted he was not the child's biological father.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Superior Court, No. B144625.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's Three Strikes prior convictions did not have to be proved at his preliminary hearing, which would be impractical and unworkable. This did not violate equal protection as he was not similarly situated as other defendants.
|
|||||
| Wershba v. Apple Computer, No. H020625.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a consolidated class action against a computer company, the trial court properly certified a nationwide class and approved a class settlement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
