 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Filarsky v. Superior Court, No. S091308.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The City of Manhattan Beach, California, was not entitled to declaratory relief to avoid disclosure of certain documents pursuant to the California Public Records Act.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Friedman, No. B151847.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As wife was advised of a potential conflict of interest orally and in writing by the attorney representing the husband, and because there was no actual conflict, the attorney's advisement did not violate professional conduct rules.
|
|||||
| People v. Del Valle, No. B151537.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As defendant was not treated under the auspices of the proper state authority for his mental health problems for a full 90 days within the year prior to his parole release date, he was improperly committed as a mentally disordered offender.
|
|||||
| People v. Howard, No. B152875.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for exhibiting a firearm was not supported by evidence that the victim was in a motor vehicle proceeding on a public street or highway, but he could be convicted for the lesser included offense of brandishing a firearm.
|
|||||
| People v. Quan Le Huynh, B147879,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Superior Court (schultz), B156693,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not unconstitutional for the State to proceed by way of information after defendant's indictment had been set aside as long as the case was heard by a magistrate within a reasonable time after the information had been filed.
|
|||||
| People v. Williams, No. S098552.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a DUI case, the California Highway Patrol's failure to comply with state regulations in administering defendant's alcohol screening test did not prevent admission of the test results at trial; noncompliance went only to the weight of the evidence.
|
|||||
| People v. Zandrino, No. A095434.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former police officer was properly convicted per a plea agreement to lewd conduct with a child; a tolling provision extended the statute of limitations for prosecution of the offenses.
|
|||||
| Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., No. A093724,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 15, 2002, Decided , July 15, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lender had no duty of to act in good faith in deciding whether to continue financing a real estate project.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
