 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of El Monte v. Comm'n on State Mandates, No. C025631.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund legislation did not impose a reimbursable state mandate on redevelopment agencies or costs on redevelopment agencies that could have been recovered solely from tax revenues.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Lockyer v. Pac. Gaming Techs., No. B134202.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Telephone calling card vending machine was held to be an illegal gaming device where chance determined whether user received money in addition to the card; it was held immaterial that a user always received a card for the amount paid.
|
|||||
| People v. Brown, No. F033118.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner was properly denied a jury instruction about temporary possession of a weapon for purposes of disposal; statute was clear that possession of any weapon was a felony, and such instruction did not apply to penal facilities.
|
|||||
| People v. Camacho, No. S075720.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was properly reversed, as defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy because the police officers had no right to be in his yard, and their observation of him was a Fourth Amendment search.
|
|||||
| People v. Hill, No. S077706.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of kidnapping and carjacking as to both a mother and her infant, the against-the-will requirement was satisfied as to the infant, because the act was done for an illegal purpose.
|
|||||
| Southard v. Superior Court, No. B139471.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a county mental health department had not been requested to supply services to a child, the department was improperly joined as a party in the child's dependency case, and a writ of mandate was issued setting aside the joinder order.
|
|||||
| Winikow v. Superior Court, No. B138616.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's imposition of sanctions of $ 150 against attorney for failure to personally serve notice of status conference on opposing party was abuse of discretion, and writ of mandate ordering money be repaid was issued.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
