Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - July 30, 2009

  
In re L.B., B214052, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Robert D., C058939, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Vivian J., D054640, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Kern County Dep't of Child Support Servs. v. Yoder, F055703, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Knapp v. Henkhaus, B209221, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Law Offices of David S. Karton v. Segreto, B211129, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in denying an attorney's petition to correct a mandatory fee arbitration award without confirming the award; pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., ? 1286, the trial court was required to confirm the arbitration award because it did not correct the award, vacate the award, or dismiss the petition.

Search Cases for Free

  
Manson, Iver & York v. Black, F056749, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Relief from default was proper under Code Civ. Proc., ? 473, subd. (d), because the judgment, amended ex parte to substitute a name for a misnamed defendant, was void; the amendment did not correct a clerical error, affected substantial rights, was made without notice or hearing, and was made without evidence of who was the intended defendant.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Brooks, D054664, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Burney, S042323, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a murder trial, Confrontation Clause was violated by admitting codefendants' statements because redactions did not completely eliminate any reference to existence of accomplices and led to the obvious inference that defendant was "the other" who shot the victim. The error was harmless because overwhelming other evidence supported a conviction.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Lam, Crim. No. B213121, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top