 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Murray, D054611,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Nelson, B206571,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Paris, D052554, D054536,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Pratcher, A117122,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Roxas, C057600,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ret. Group v. Galante, D054207,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ret. v. State Water Res. Control Bd., A122884,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| S.B. v. B.J., D053498,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New York, B204878,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer failed to show absence of a triable issue of fact as to equitable estoppel, it was not entitled to summary judgment based on contractual limitations period; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.4, required it to notify insured of contractual limitations provisions that might apply, regardless of whether insured was represented by counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
