 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barber v. Chang, G036448,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a negligence action arising from a shooting by a tenant, the owner of an apartment complex failed to establish that he owed no duty to a former tenant to take simple protective measures because the owner had received a report that the shooter had brandished a gun and thus was alerted that the shooter posed a risk of serious injury.
|
|||||
| Georgiev v. County of Santa Clara, H029347,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property owner's residence was not 100 percent complete in July 1995 for property tax assessment purposes when the building inspector gave a final OK to an addition because the addition was not available for use in July 1995 due to its lack of functionality and the need for significant repairs to its major components.
|
|||||
| McKenzie v. Vanderpoel, B186768,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The availability of a procedure under the California Uniform Principal and Income Act to reallocate principal and income did not exempt a second tier beneficiary's adjustment petition from the scope of a trust's no contest clause. The adjustment petition would have impaired the trust.
|
|||||
| People v. Nguyen, G036837,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In denying bribery defendant's postrial Pitchess motion, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the requested police personnel records were immaterial to defendant's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Disclosure of the records would not have led to a different result at trial.
|
|||||
| Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova, C044653,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a land-use case raising claims under CEQA, California's Planning and Zoning Law, Gov. Code, § 65000 et seq., and public trust doctrine, because a project's final environmental impact report's analysis of long-term water-supply and effects on a river was inadequate, revision and recirculation of the draft environmental impact report was required.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
