LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - July 31 - August 3, 2009

  
1538 Cahuenga Partners, LLC v. Turmeko Properties, Inc., B209548, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a quiet title action, a party's oral statement to the trial court in chambers that he understood and agreed to the terms of a settlement satisfied the requirement of Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, that a party stipulate to a settlement orally before the court; it was not necessary that the party consent to the settlement on the record.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Griffin Dewatering Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York, G036896, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In light of unsettled case law regarding a pollution exclusion when an insurer rejected a claim, the insurer acted reasonably in denying a defense and could not be liable for bad faith tort damages, for attorney fees, or for punitive damages under Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (a). An oral promise not pleaded could not serve as a basis for recovery.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McMahon v. Craig, G040324, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a veterinary malpractice case, a dog owner could not recover for the emotional distress caused by her dog's death because none of the conduct, including alleged efforts to cover up malpractice, was sufficiently extreme or outrageous for intentional infliction and the owner was neither a witness nor a direct victim for purposes of negligence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Paland v. Brooktrails Township Community Services Dist. Bd. of Directors, A122630, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Water and sewer base charges imposed while water service was turned off were fees subject to Cal. Const., art. XIII D, § 6, rather than assessments subject to Cal. Const., art. XIII D, § 4; the services were immediately available to the owner pursuant to Cal. Const., art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (b)(4), because service connections had been provided.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Black, E046128, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's poor performance on probation could properly be considered in imposing an aggravated term; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.435(b)(1), did not preclude consideration of defendant's conduct between the original grant of probation and the reinstatement of probation, and any improper consideration of events thereafter was harmless error.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Conerly, A121696, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion under Pen. Code, § 1098, by denying severance of defendants in a drug case because the codefendant's exculpatory testimony was not shown to be bona fide; it was uncertain whether the codefendant would actually testify on defendant's behalf; and concerns about judicial efficiency weighed against severance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Thorn, A121336, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 31, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a reasonable person would view a carport contiguous to and functionally interconnected with inhabited apartment building as enclosed area into which member of general public could not pass without authorization, under reasonable belief test, defendant's entry of carport with felonious intent was first-degree burglary under Pen. Code, § 460.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club of Southern California, S155129, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 3, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: After an assault and battery committed by a homeowner against plaintiff, although plaintiff alleged that the homeowner had acted under the unreasonable belief of having to defend himself, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the homeowner in the lawsuit brought against him by plaintiff.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., S147552, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 3, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Installing a hidden video camera in an office, although a privacy intrusion under Cal. Const., art 1, § 1, was not actionable because it was not highly offensive to a reasonable person, given that an unknown person was accessing pornography on the Internet and the employer wanted to provide a wholesome environment for abused children in its care.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Dietz, G040640, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, August 3, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Access to and increased value of a wife's share of retirement accounts did not warrant reducing spousal support based on a material change of circumstances under Fam. Code, § 4320, but were within the parties' reasonable expectations because a stipulated judgment upon dissolution of marriage expressly divided the accounts and any increase in value.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.