 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Conservatorship of Wendland, No. S087265.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conservator could not withhold artificial nutrition and hydration from a conscious conservatee in the absence of clear and convincing evidence that conservator's decision was in accordance with either conservatee's own wishes or best interest.
|
|||||
| Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Smilecare, No. B147727.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, the trial court improperly granted summary judgment; defendants failed to meet their burden of making a prima facie showing that an affirmative defense applied.
|
|||||
| In re Joshua M., No. E028003.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The offense of peeking did not require proof of specific intent to commit an offense if the opportunity arose, unlike loitering offense, therefore conviction of minor was affirmed. Jury instruction requiring intent was erroneous.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Cloney, No. A093238.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Escrow agent who learned, while notarizing sales documents, that property seller used two different names had actual knowledge; this was imputed to purchaser who thus had constructive notice of lien against seller recorded under his full name.
|
|||||
| Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. C036454.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A bank was entitled to exercise a right of setoff for amounts due on consumer credit cards by debiting the consumers's joint checking account.
|
|||||
| People v. Seaton, No. S011425.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where victim was beaten twice with hammer and robbed, evidence supported finding that killing occurred during a robbery and supported defendant's felony murder conviction; use of restraints was improper but did not impact verdict.
|
|||||
| Rental Equip. v. McDaniel Builders, No. B139044.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preliminary mechanic's lien notices of $ 10,000 were not a derived figure, arrived at by rational analysis as required by statute; foreclosure judgment against unpaid equipment rental company was supported by substantial evidence and affirmed.
|
|||||
| Francisco G. v. Superior Court, No. H022860.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where father's parental rights to his own child as well as child's half-siblings were terminated after his child tested positive for cocaine after her birth, bypass provision could be applied to father who was not custodial parent.
|
|||||
| Karen H. v. Superior Court, No. C038357.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The juvenile court was permitted to deny mother's request for reunification services where the evidence showed that she had a history of substance abuse and a resistance to treatment.
|
|||||
| People v. Superior Court (gevorgyan), No. B147452, No. B147799.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, August 10, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where minors were charged with murder, attempted murder, and street terrorism, Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act required they be prosecuted by way of information after preliminary hearing and not by grand jury indictment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
