 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fletcher v. Superior Court, No. A096372.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 19, 2002, Decided , July 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A police department was not entitled to withhold from a defendant discovery concerning the arresting officers' past employment history because the privilege protecting officers did not prevent the disclosure of such materials.
|
|||||
| Furman v. Department of Motor Vehicles, No. H022764.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 19, 2002, Decided , July 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reinstatement of driving privileges was affirmed when the department of motor vehicles as the proponent of the forensic alcohol analysis failed to establish that a person with an official duty had prepared it.
|
|||||
| People v. Westbrook, No. B158267.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 19, 2002, Decided , July 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's order denying defendant's request for placement in a drug treatment program was reversed because his prior juvenile adjudication for robbery was not a "conviction" that disqualified him from the treatment program.
|
|||||
| E.M.M.I., Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co., B152740,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Loss of jewelry stolen from a travelling salesperson's car was not covered by his jeweler's block insurance policy, the salesperson was not actually in the car at the time of the theft.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Carpenter, No. B150606.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, July 22, 2002, Decided , July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dissolution award of $ 415,000 to ex-husband as reimbursement for separate property contribution to marriage, and spousal support awarded ex-wife with no ruling on modifiability, were upheld. Quitclaim of title to community property was not gift.
|
|||||
| Jordan v. Department of Motor Vehicles, Nos. C038339, C038343, C038735.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 22, 2002, Decided , July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An award of over $ 88 million in public monies pursuant to statutory authority for an arbitration in the settlement of an $ 18 million dispute over smog impact fees was an unconstitutional gift of public funds.
|
|||||
| Ogborn v. City of Lancaster, No. B150712.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, July 22, 2002, Decided , July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no statutory provision that operated to render a code enforcement officer immune from certain tenants' conversion claim, the city was also potentially liable under the claim.
|
|||||
| People v. Gurule, No. S018815.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 22, 2002, Decided , July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of the first-degree murder of a woman while defendant was already serving a sentence for second-degree murder of another woman, the death penalty was warranted.
|
|||||
| People v. Rodriguez, No. S098821.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 22, 2002, Decided , July 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case involving continuous sexual abuse of a child, the trial court did not err in failing to give clarifying instructions on its own motion; the term "recurring access" had a commonly understood meaning.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
