LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - August 15 - August 17, 2001

  
Account Management Associated v. Sanglimsuwan, B143601, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, August 15, 2001, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Without the creditor's signature, the stipulation was not enforceable, and the judgment entered in favor of the creditor on its action to foreclose on a trust deed on the debtor's residence was reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hirshfield v. Schwartz, No. B138714., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In encroachment action, trial court properly balanced equities under the relative hardship doctrine, and did not abuse discretion in denying injunction, giving defendants interest in the disputed areas, and ordering them to pay plaintiffs.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Bryant, No. B145321., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, August 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Order granting mother primary physical custody, even though she planned to move out of state, was not an abuse of discretion; father had liberal visitation, mother was not acting in bad faith, and it was in children's best interest.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bonta v. Friedman, No. B143552., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Birth defect was "injury" under statute providing for reimbursement of Medi-Cal benefits, so law firm violated statute when it did not pay state after settling medical malpractice case. Thus, grant of demurrer, without leave to amend, was error.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lugtu v. Cal. Highway Patrol, No. S088116., SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Officer who pulled vehicle over to center median, where it was hit by a truck, could be liable for negligence under reasonable prudent person standard; duty of care was intended to protect from that risk, so officer's conduct was legal cause.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Am. Contractors Indem. Co., No. B137602, No. B144246., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, August 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Since surety was not given proper notice of forfeiture, it had to be released from its bond obligation. Nothing in statute gave courts permission to consider prejudice in exonerating bond for failure to meet deadline.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Renee J. v. Superior Court, No. S090730., SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute permitting the juvenile court to deny reunification services where the risk of recidivism was a concern was not a violation of substantive due process.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Britton, No. G025710., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, August 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of motion to suppress and conviction for heroin possession were upheld; core elements of due process were not adversely affected by allowing prosecution to orally respond to the motion to suppress. Flight of two men justified stop.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.