 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Groves v. Peterson, No. B152404.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 26, 2002, Decided , July 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment debtor's independent action in equity to set aside default and default judgment was not collaterally estopped by denial of motion in underlying action raising same grounds because motion did not provide opportunity to fully litigate issue.
|
|||||
| People v. Muszynski, No. H021243.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 26, 2002, Decided , July 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As apartment was not considered a building for purposes of the aggravated arson statute, but because defendant did cause great bodily injury, defendant's aggravated arson conviction was reduced to simple arson causing such injury.
|
|||||
| Stoops v. Abbassi, No. B144337.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, July 26, 2002, Decided , July 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As only a trust fund board had the authority to collect unpaid assessments, and this right was ultimately transferred to a receiver, one trust fund member was not entitled to pursue such assessments against other members directly.
|
|||||
| Walker v. San Francisco Housing Authority, No. A095476.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, July 26, 2002, Decided , July 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Default judgment and the order denying the employer's motion to set aside the default judgment were upheld, as the commissioner had jurisdiction to impose discovery sanctions and hear any motions that challenged its order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
