Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - August 12, 2009
	DVD Copy Control Assn., Inc. v. Kaleidescape, Inc., H031631, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 12, 2009, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Express terms of a license agreement, which were sufficiently clear to ascertain the parties' intent as contemplated by Civ. Code, § 1636, 1638, required the licensee to build its system according to specifications that the licensor would later provide. Extrinsic evidence showed that a general specifications document was among those specifications. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Johnson, F055768, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 12, 2009, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Jhaveri v. Teitelbaum, B203923, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, August 12, 2009, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Although defendants argued that under Code Civ. Proc., § 877, the trial court should have reduced the claims against them by the $ 1 million amount that their co-obligors promised to pay plaintiffs in a settlement agreement, § 877 did not apply because the settlement occurred after, not before, the judgment. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Avila, S078664, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 12, 2009, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Butler, S055501, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, August 12, 2009, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.