 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City & County of Denver v. Gonzales, Nos. 99SC738; 00SC111,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A three year statute of limitations applied to all tort actions for bodily injury or property damage which arose out of the use or operation of a motor vehicle, whether or not the tortfeasor was operating a motor vehicle.
|
|||||
| Egbune v. People, No. 00PDJ058,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At the reinstatement proceeding, petitioner sought to minimize and justify his prior misconduct. Thus, he failed to demonstrate rehabilitation from that misconduct, and he was denied reinstatement to the practice of law.
|
|||||
| Egbune v. State, Case No.: 00PDJ058,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was not rehabilitated so as to be entitled to reinstatement to practice of law, as he presented no evidence of his positive and successful efforts to correct the deficits from which his original misconduct arose.
|
|||||
| In re Price, No. 99SA131,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney failed to comply with the terms and regulations required of suspended attorneys, attorney's petition for reinstatement was denied, and attorney was precluded from repetitioning for an additional two years.
|
|||||
| People v. Cervantes-Arredondo, No. 00SA102,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had to determine if detention of a driver after a police officer had issued a citation was either consensual or supported by reasonable suspicion before excluding evidence seized pursuant to a subsequent search of the vehicle.
|
|||||
| People v. King, Nos. 00SA207 and 00SA222,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By ordering defendants out of their vehicle, handcuffing them, and detaining them while police searched defendants' vehicle, defendants were under arrest which required probable cause as precursor to the stop and not just reasonable suspicion.
|
|||||
| People v. Young, No. 99SC426,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On a challenge for cause to a potential juror, an appellate court should have applied a very high standard for determining whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the challenge.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
