 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cendant Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Dep't of Revenue, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0103,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in reversing the decision to reject the amended corporate tax return, because the published statutes and regulations in effect for tax year 2001 clearly allowed combined and consolidated returns together, and the affiliated corporate group was deemed to have had knowledge of the filing option before the filing deadline.
|
|||||
| Gf Gaming Corp. v. Taylor, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0475,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of costs for document coding was affirmed, because there was little functional difference between computerized legal research expenses and those for document coding, and the appellate court deferred to the trial court's finding that the document coding expenses were reasonably incurred.
|
|||||
| Hardesty v. Pino, Court of Appeals No. 07CA1105,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Huffman v. Westmoreland Coal Co., Court of Appeals No. 07CA2180,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Powell, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1369,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Moore, Court of Appeals No. 05CA1592,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to prove that the value of the stolen evidence exceeded $ 15,000 under Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-4-410 because the majority of the victims' valuation testimony was based on speculation, guesses, assumptions, purchase prices many years old, and evidence not admitted at trial.
|
|||||
| People v. Oram, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0023,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Orozco, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1533,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion by denying defendant's motion for funds to hire an expert under Chief Justice Directive 04-04, ¿ IV(D)(c) because it accepted that defendant had become indigent in the course of the case, even though he was represented by private counsel, and that there were insufficient funds with which to hire an expert.
|
|||||
| People v. Perez, Court of Appeals No. 07CA1746,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SEVEN, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Fourth Amendment, search of locked glove compartment was proper as it was incident to lawful arrest. Under Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿ 18-1.3-401(1)(a)(V)(A), (10)(a), (10)(b)(XI), 15 year sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine was proper as it was in presumptive range and community corrections sentence was inappropriate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
