 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Robles, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1811,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-11-205(5), defendant was not denied his right to due process because the prosecution's continuance motion clearly and unequivocally identified his murder conviction as the ground for revoking his probation. Also, he did not claim that form of notice compromised his ability to present a defense at the revocation hearing.
|
|||||
| Rider v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Court of Appeals No. 08CA0038,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of the insurer was reversed and remanded, because the three-year limitations period applied to uninsured motorist claims against the insurer, and the insured filed suit against the insurer within three years after the cause of action accrued, as required by the first clause of Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-107.5(1)(a).
|
|||||
| Smith v. Exec. Custom Homes, Inc., Court of Appeals No 08CA0426,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issue as to whether repair doctrine tolled the running of statute of limitations under Construction Defect Action Reform Act could not be resolved on summary judgment. Absence of subsequent manifestations of defect for nearly a year after repair requests were made could have reasonably led homeowners to assume that no further action was necessary.
|
|||||
| US Fax Law Ctr., Inc. v. Henry Schein, Inc., Court of Appeals No. 08CA0012,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wallin v. Cosner, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0913,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff sought review of a prison disciplinary proceeding, he timely deposited his complaint with the prison mail system within thirty days as required by Colo. R. Civ. P. 106(b) but it was not received by the trial court until five days later; the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint as untimely without making additional findings.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
