 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A.C. v. People, No. 99SC472,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment that a juvenile was not entitled to a jury trial affirmed. Trial court had not abused its discretion when it refused to grant a jury trial. The juvenile had not been charged with one of the listed crimes requiring a jury trial.
|
|||||
| Clementi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., No. 99SC500,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In underinsured motorist case, once it was shown that insured had unreasonably provided delayed notice, insurer could only deny benefits if it could prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it was prejudiced by delay.
|
|||||
| Davidson v. McClellan, No. 99SA240,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A subsequent decision by the United States Supreme Court was insufficient justification to vacate the final judgment by the district court even where some of the parties in the federal cause of action were also parties in the state action.
|
|||||
| Outlaw v. People, No. 99SC662,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a seizure of petitioner for suspected possession of cocaine, the fact that the area was known as a high crime area with previous drug arrests in the past did not constitute probable cause to stop and search an individual.
|
|||||
| People v. Martinez, No. 99SA206,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When the dissenting judge on a three-judge sentencing panel based his decision to not impose a death penalty sentence on a factual reason, as opposed to a legal one, the appellate court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal on his dissent.
|
|||||
| People v. Daitzman, Case No.: 00PDJ052,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, January 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Egregious neglect of client matter constituted abandonment under Colorado law; lengthy suspension with restitution was appropriate sanction in case involving several extreme instances of neglect and abandonment.
|
|||||
| A.D. Store Co., Inc. v. Executive Dir. of Dep't of Revenue, Case No. 99SC861,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alteration services performed by clothing retailer which were separable from the clothing purchases were not independently subject to sales taxation pursuant to sales tax statute and relevant regulations.
|
|||||
| City of Boulder v. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1, Case No.99SC304,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate judgment in inverse condemnation action, evaluating just compensation for temporary taking, was affirmed in part, but jury's restoration costs award was reinstated and new trial ordered on what was fair rental value.
|
|||||
| People v. Jasper, Case No. 99SC987,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court held that a trial court may impose and enforce a plea cutoff deadline as part of its case management authority but must provide adequate notice of the deadline and permit an exception to deadline for good cause.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
