 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Woellhaf v. People, Case No. 03SC664,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's multiple punishments for sexual assault on a child, based on different types of sexual contact, were barred on double jeopardy grounds.
|
|||||
| City of Aurora v. Simpson (In re Water Rights of Park County Sportsmen's Ranch), No. 01SA412,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Water court's dismissal of ranch's application for determination of water rights and augmentation plan was affirmed because evidence at trial was insufficient to support a decree for claimed surface appropriations.
|
|||||
| Lobato v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, No. 03SC556,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a workers' compensation proceeding, an employee's division independent medical examiner report was improperly found to be untimely under retrospectively applied new time limit because he did not receive notice, as provided by administrative rule.
|
|||||
| People v. Baker, Case No. 04SA194,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where failures of trial counsel and court to perform duties owed to defendant led to out-of-time filing of notice of appeal, good cause was shown to accept late-filed notice; therefore, court of appeals abused its discretion in rejecting the appeal.
|
|||||
| Quintano v. People, Case No. 03SC567,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sexual assault convictions did not violate double jeopardy because each incident occurred in a different location, or after the victim had left a location and returned there, and defendant had time to reflect after each encounter.
|
|||||
| People v. Darlington, Case No. 04SA186,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 24, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Colorado's deferred sentencing statute did not preclude defendant from entering a plea of nolo contendere where "plea of guilty" was a generic phrase and the statute did not contravene the court's authority to accept a plea of nolo contendere.
|
|||||
| Weil v. Dillon Cos., Case No. 04SA356,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, January 24, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused discretion in ordering personal injury plaintiff to release all of his medical records; plaintiff did not waive physician patient privilege by making generic, garden variety claims for pain and suffering incident to accident.
|
|||||
| People v. Donaldson, 05PDJ009.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, January 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
