 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tate v. Colo. Dep't of Revenue, Court of Appeals No. 05CA1823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was nothing arbitrary and capricious in the Colorado Department of Revenue's denial to reschedule a driver's license revocation hearing, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-2-126 (2006), as the requests appeared to have been made too late to be accommodated and the driver failed to establish a compelling reason to require rescheduling.
|
|||||
| Woodward v. Bd. of Dirs. of Tamarron Ass'n of Condo. Owners, Court of Appeals No.: 05CA0457,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether approval of proposed modifications to condominium unit was arbitrary and capricious, as it was not possible to conclude from photographs alone whether modifications to units were substantially similar to what was proposed or to what had been previously approved and constructed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
