 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cinemark USA, Inc. v. Seest, Court of Appeals No. 06CA2549,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Theater's use of motion picture film reels for display to the public for profit was subject to a use tax under Code of the City of Fort Collins, Colo., ch. 25, art. III, div. 1, ¿ 25-74 (1986); the theater's transactions with the film distributors was the theater's use of the physical film reels, which rendered the transactions taxable events.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Schmedeman, Court of Appeals No. 06CA0550,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property award in a dissolution action was improper because the wife's objection to the husband's giving the logs and the cabin shell to his parents during the marriage did not preserve the wife's right to have the log cabin classified as marital under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. ¿¿ 14-10-101 to 14-10-113.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Slowinski, Court of Appeals Nos. 05CA0465, 05CA2523 & 06CA1830,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Novak v. Craven, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1041,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Paris v. Dance, Court of Appeals No. 06CA2468,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION A, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People ex rel. D.P., Court of Appeals No. 07CA1342,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Hotle, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1617,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Muniz, Court of Appeals No. 03CA0268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for second-degree murder and two counts of a crime of violence were improper because the district court abused its discretion in granting the prosecution's motion in limine as to a suspect. That evidence was sufficient to show reasonable doubt as to the identity of the perpetrator.
|
|||||
| Sapp v. El Paso County Dep't of Human Servs., Court of Appeals No. 06CA2291,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
