 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Harter, Court of Appeals No. 07CA1156,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SEVEN, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Hill, Court of Appeals No. 07CA2171,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Shover, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0187,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for possession of chemicals or supplies to manufacture methamphetamine and possession of a precursor for methamphetamine were proper because the chemicals seized from a room in defendant's residence were in plain view of an officer who entered the residence with the consent of defendant's wife.
|
|||||
| People v. Stevenson, Court of Appeals No. 06CA1612,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sherritt v. Rocky Mt. Fire Dist., Court of Appeals No. 08CA0914,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sanction imposed for violation of the Fair Campaign Practices Act was affirmed, because the administrative law judge found that public funds would be used to satisfy the penalty, and therefore, a large fine would compound the violation of using public money to urge electors to vote in favor of a ballot issue.
|
|||||
| Steele v. Allen, Court of Appeals No. 07CA2163,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the negligent misrepresentation claim was reversed and remanded, because the claimant, as a non-client, could assert a claim of negligent misrepresentation against the attorney and law firm, when a claim based on negligent misrepresentation was independent of any principle of contract law, and privity was not required.
|
|||||
| Woodrow v. Wildlife Comm'n, Dep't of Natural Res., Court of Appeals No. 08CA0753,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, February 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: One year suspension of the licensees' hunting and fishing licences was affirmed, because even thought the suspensions were based on the same facts as the criminal charges of criminal trespass, the suspensions did not constitute multiple punishments in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
