 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Daley v. Univ. of Colo. Health Scis. Ctr., Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0078,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Patient's complaint against a state-operated health center for alleged improper disclosure of records should have been dismissed because there was no waiver of immunity for ancillary conduct performed by the health center.
|
|||||
| Highlands Ranch Univ. Park v. Uno of Highlands Ranch, Inc. , Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0724,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As breaching tenant was entitled to offset for present value of excess rent expected from replacement tenants during 20-year lease term, court had to make findings as to present value of excess rent and offset this against damages owed landlord.
|
|||||
| Negron v. Gillespie, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1977,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of inmate's claim for mandamus relief and for an Eighth Amendment violation was affirmed because the prison's charging a co-payment for treatment and failing to provide aspirin for 13 days did not state a cognizable claim for relief.
|
|||||
| People v. King, Court of Appeals No.: 02CA0201,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A victim's hearsay statements to a police officer were properly admitted as excited utterances, and their admission did not violate defendant's right to confrontation where the statements were nontestimonial in nature.
|
|||||
| People v. Vensor, Court of Appeals No. 03CA1983,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentencing court properly considered testimony of other families whose children claimed to have been molested by defendant, as there was no showing testimony was untrue and it was relevant to defendant's character and potential for rehabilitation.
|
|||||
| Rector v. City & County of Denver, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA0857,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, January 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motorists' claims concerning late fees for parking violations were precluded under voluntary payment rule but the requests for declaratory and injunctive relief were improperly dismissed as motorists were interested persons addressing future conduct.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
