 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Jones, No. 97CA2040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stipulation in defendant's second plea agreement to "2 years DOC" could not be read as an agreement to eliminate the three-year mandatory parole term that defendant was advised of in his first plea agreement.
|
|||||
| People v. Patton, No. 98CA0892,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for possession and manufacture of drugs affirmed where it was not evident convictions were based on identical conduct; and no abuse of discretion in considering degree to which defendant participated in crimes.
|
|||||
| People v. Troudt, No. 98CA1287,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to suppress was properly denied where methamphetamine was discovered during an administrative weapons search at a courthouse security checkpoint.
|
|||||
| Perez v. Witham, No. 98CA1225,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had discretion to disregard law of the case doctrine and grant previously denied motion to dismiss because the first ruling (based upon an improper choice of limitations statute) was legally erroneous.
|
|||||
| Rainsberger v. Klein, No. 98CA2029,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Default judgment was reversed, because original complaint and service of process did not put defendant on notice of any claims against him individually and default judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Rocky Mt. Greyhound Park v. Wembley, P.L.C., No. 98CA0254,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rational basis standard of review was appropriate for equal protection analysis where statute challenged by plaintiff did not infringe upon a fundamental right or involve a suspect class.
|
|||||
| Sohocki v. Colorado Air Quality Control Comm'n, No. 98CA1861,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, December 9, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rulemaking by defendant air quality control commission affirmed because plaintiff failed to show that the participation by two commissioners with conflicts of interest created an appearance of impropriety.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
