 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bruce v. City of Colo. Springs , Case No. 05SA365,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a citizen's challenge to a voter-approved ballot measure to extend an existing sales and use tax, the trial court erred by invalidating the approved measure as a tax extension was not a tax increase within the meaning of Colo. Const. art. X, § 20(3)'s election notice provisions; thus, the election notice requirements did not apply.
|
|||||
| Aloi v. Union Pac. R.R. Corp., Case No. 04SC320,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in providing jury with adverse inference instruction, repeating it, and interrupting cross-examination to give instruction as a sanction for railroad's spoliation of evidence in employee's personal injury suit where court found railroad willfully destroyed relevant evidence which would have been introduced.
|
|||||
| Klinger v. Adams County Sch. Dist. No. 50, Case No. 04SC724,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of the court of appeals was reversed and remanded because the phrase "ordinary and necessary expenses" as used in Colo. Rev. Stat. § 22-63-202(2)(a), limited the damages the school district could recover from the teacher who resigned without proper notice, to the actual expenditures incurred in finding a replacement.
|
|||||
| People v. Crews, Case Number: 05PDJ049,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, March 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney, who was licensed in Colorado, was disbarred in Oregon for various violations of disciplinary rules, he was given the same sanction in Colorado disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to Colo. R. Prof. Conduct 251.21(e) since he failed to participate in the Colorado proceedings or challenge the order from Oregon.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
