 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Chavarria-Sanchez, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0241,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, March 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court ordered surety to forfeit bond posted on behalf of a defendant, who failed to appear because he had been deported. Surety argued that she should only forfeit amount of fees collected from defendant. Surety was not entitled to relief because Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-3-503(1)(c) did not apply retroactively.
|
|||||
| People v. McDowell, Court of Appeals No. 07CA1358,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, March 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's Colo. R. Crim. P. 35 postconviction motion alleged outrageous government conduct, in that his confession was coerced. As this claim had been unsuccessfully raised on direct appeal, albeit in the guise of allegations that his statements were involuntary and were obtained in violation of Miranda, it was procedurally barred.
|
|||||
| People v. Montes-Rodriguez, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0578,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By using victim's Social Security number to obtain loan, defendant knowingly assumed fictitious capacity, and impliedly asserted his fitness to repay loan. As he furnished false information to obtain a benefit he could not otherwise have obtained, evidence was sufficient to convict him of criminal impersonation (Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-113(1)(e)).
|
|||||
| Silver v. Colo. Cas. Ins. Co., Court of Appeals No. 07CA2216,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SEVEN, March 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Homeowner waived the right to argue that an insurance company did not meet Colo. R. Civ. P. 9(b) requirements regarding a rescission defense; the company was improperly granted summary judgment because issues existed as to whether the homeowner told the agent one thing but the agent put down another and whether the company was on inquiry notice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
