 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pratt v. Pratt (In re Estate of Ligon), Court of Appeals No. 05CA2442,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Only a beneficiary who was given a waiver under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25.5-4-302(4) from her share of medical expenditures owed by an estate to the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing should have benefitted when the estate was distributed; the portion left due to the waiver should have not been divided amongst all beneficiaries.
|
|||||
| Saxe v. Bd. of Trs. of Metro. State College of Denver, Court of Appeals No. 05CA1251,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inter alia, as loss of job security in event of reduction on force (RIF) would strip professors' tenure of its substance, rights to priority and relocation were essential to their contractual right to tenure and were substantive in nature and college board did not have statutory or contractual authority to unilaterally modify handbook provisions.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Court of Appeals No.: 05CA2079,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, March 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the homeowners' incurred property damage caused by the discharge of water from the plumbing system, their insurance company denied coverage based upon the water below the surface of the ground exclusion in the policy. In a bad faith action, the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the insurance company under Colo. R. Civ. P. 56.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
