 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aisenberg v. Campbell, No. 00SA49,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The proposed ballot initiatives did not violate the Colorado Constitution; they did not present multiple subjects. Respondent title board did not have to include every aspect of a proposal in the title and submission clause.
|
|||||
| Aisenberg v. Campbell (In re Title for 1999-2000 # 245[b]-[e]), No. 000SA35,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Initiative title setting board's action in fixing proposed initiatives was affirmed, except as to inconsistent clause eliminating requirement of five-year minimum licensure for district court judges.
|
|||||
| Jarco, Inc. v. PUC, No. 98SA425,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision of Colorado Public Utilities Commission finding petitioner responsible for certain utility bills was affirmed as neither arbitrary nor capricious.
|
|||||
| People v. Post, Case No.: GC98B102 (consolidated with GC98B122, 99PDJ031, 00PDJ002, and 00PDJ063),
Supreme Court of Colorado, Presiding Disciplinary Judge, May 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney could not establish a causal connection between depression and misconduct, including inadequate representation of 19 clients and conversion of client funds, conduct was not mitigated and attorney was disbarred.
|
|||||
| In re Cleland, No. 99SA89,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was ordered disbarred from the practice of law in Colorado due to his knowing misappropriation of client funds.
|
|||||
| In re Sather, No. 99SA72,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where it was unclear that attorney must deposit advance fees, including flat fees, into a trust account until they were earned, attorney was not disciplined; however he was suspended for other ethical violations.
|
|||||
| In re Wimmershoff, No. 99SA27,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, May 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disciplined for ethical violations; however, he was not disciplined for failing to deposit advance fee into trust account where court would not to enforce until formally promulgating and adopting new rules.
|
|||||
| People v. Bauer, No. 99PDJ051,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, May 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disbarred for misappropriating public funds and commingling client funds.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
