 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| HealthSouth Corp. v. Boulder County Bd. of Comm'r, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0233,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taxpayer could pursue abatement and refund claims for overvaluation pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 39-10-114(1)(a)(I)(A) as to fictitious assets it had reported as part of a stock price manipulation scheme; the unclean hands doctrine was inapplicable because Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-5-116(2)(c), 39-10-114(1)(b) addressed misstatements in tax filings.
|
|||||
| Iler v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 08CA1040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claimant who sought an increase in his average weekly wage to include room and board under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-40-201(19)(b) (2008) could meet his evidentiary burden under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-43-201 (2008) by showing that his current living conditions and food were similar to the room and board provided to him in Antarctica.
|
|||||
| Kobobel v. State, Court of Appeals No. 08CA0530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners claimed that cease and desist orders that required them to stop pumping water constituted a taking in violation of Colo. Const. art. II, § 15, and U.S. Const. amend. V and XIV; however, a district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the matter was a water court matter.
|
|||||
| Kuhndog, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No. 08CA1926,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer sought review of final order issued by Industrial Claim Appeals Office with respect to employer's alleged failure to carry workers' compensation insurance. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-43-409 did not violate employer's due process rights because employer failed to request a prehearing conference in a timely manner.
|
|||||
| People v. Castellano, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0979,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not violate defendant's right against double jeopardy by increasing his two-year sentence to three and one-half years because he had no legitimate expectation of finality in his sentence; he took advantage of suspension of finality afforded by Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(b) to successfully argue that his sentence should be reduced to probation.
|
|||||
| People v. Clark, Court of Appeals No. 07CA0157,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence, including narrow window of time that victim owned sweatshirt, combined with mother's denial and defendant's initial denial of consensual sexual encounter, was sufficient to reasonably exclude hypothesis that DNA was deposited at time other than that of crime and to convict of defendant of sexual assault, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-402(1)(a).
|
|||||
| People v. Pasillas-Sanchez, Court of Appeals No. 05CA2625,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Torres, Court of Appeals No. 03CA2480,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Whittman v. Foiles (In re Estate of Whittman), Court of Appeals No. 08CA0720,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION SIX, March 19, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent's wife qualified as a surviving spouse under Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 15-11-104, 15-10-201(53), 15-11-403, 15-11-405 (2008), and although she died before her exempt property allowance was filed, her estate was entitled to file the claim because it was an organization as defined in § 15-10-201(35) and a person under § 15-10-201(38).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
