LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Colorado - March 25, 2004

  
People v. Alengi, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0830, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The court of appeals reversed defendant's conviction for several drug offenses, because defendant did not make a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of her right to counsel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Harper, Court of Appeals No. 02CA1059, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In postconviction case, appellate court held that sentencing scheme was not arbitrary and statute violated neither equal protection nor due process of law, but trial court erred in rejecting claim that parole was unlawfully revoked.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. McAfee, Court of Appeals No. 00CA2379, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain a vehicular homicide conviction, where defendant drove into a pole, he had been smoking crack cocaine for several days prior to the accident, and he had partied throughout the night before the accident.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Weinreich, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0995, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court erred in allowing the constructive amendment of the information charging defendant with child abuse resulting in death following the close of evidence; the error was plain error such that a new trial was necessary.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rocky Mt. Animal Def. v. Colo. Div. of Wildlife, Court of Appeals No. 02CA0503, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In wildlife group's suit seeking mandamus or injunctive relief, the constitutional amendment in question did not prohibit the poisoning of nontargeted wildlife incidental to poisoning of prairie dogs by a person who intended to control rodents.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Svendsen v. Robinson, Court of Appeals No. 03CA0365, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In patient's appeal of summary judgment for doctor in medical malpractice case, judgment was affirmed; due to discovery violations, patient was unable to demonstrate genuine issue of material fact existed to support her medical malpractice claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wenz v. Nat'l Westminster Bank, PLC, Court of Appeals No. 03CA0124, COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: It was not arbitrary or an abuse of discretion to require the business to assert facts to satisfy the trial court that discovery might have revealed evidence showing personal jurisdiction before requiring the bank to respond to discovery.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.