 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ceja v. Lemire, Case No. 06SC375,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A driver acting in the scope and course of his employment at the time of a motor vehicle accident was immune from a negligence suit based on Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-10-118(2)(a), 24-10-106(1) because immunity was only waived if the driver was operating a vehicle owned or lease by a public entity; instead, he was driving his own vehicle.
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. Downing (In re Hernandez), Case No. 06SA211,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to transfer venue of one portion of a wrongful death under Colo. R. Civ. P. 98 was improperly granted because only one civil action was permitted under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-203(1); the specific statute governed over the inconsistent rule under Colo. R. Civ. P. 81(a).
|
|||||
| People v. Ramirez, Case No. 06SC71,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lower court improperly applied the standards of admissibility set forth in case law that predated the Colorado Rules of Evidence in finding that a certified nurse practitioner's testimony should not have been admitted in a criminal trial on a sexual assault on a child charge. Under Colo. R. Evid. 401 and 702, the testimony was admissible.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
