Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Colorado - April 10 - April 17, 2006
	Alvarado v. People, Case No. 04SC868, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's conviction for criminal impersonation was affirmed because Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-5-113(1)(e) did not require proof of two acts; rather it criminalized the use of a false identity with the intent to gain an unlawful benefit, such as defendant's use of a false identity to avoid arrest under an outstanding warrant during a traffic stop. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Reed, Case No. 05SA299, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a criminal prosecution in which several counts were alleged, defendant challenged venue in a certain county. District court erred, pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-202, in finding that venue was proper for some of the counts in a different county because district court did not take evidence and adequate factual findings were needed. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Humphrey, Case No. 05SA364, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 17, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Statements a defendant made to officer after being advised that the stabbing victim had died were properly suppressed by the trial court because they were the product of psychological coercion, as the officer's questions after defendant's breakdown implied that he sought to take advantage of her emotional state. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.