Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Colorado - April 9 - April 17, 2007
	City of Colo. Springs v. Powell, Case No. 05SC743, Case No. 05SC746, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 9, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Amended Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-10-103(5.5) (2003) applied prospectively where neither the language of the statute, its legislative history, nor the definition of the term in use prior to the legislation's adoption supported the municipalities' contention that the General Assembly clearly intended the amendments to be retroactive. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	City of Colo. Springs v. Speight Family P'ship, Case No. 05SC744, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 9, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because the modifications and additions to the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, as set forth in H.B. 03-1288 (Colo.), operated only prospectively, they did not apply to respondent property owners' claims against petitioner city. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Bradshaw, Case No. 06SA366, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 9, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's statements to a police officer were properly suppressed as he had unambiguously requested an attorney during a custodial interrogation and the officer's questioning immediately after the request did not seek to clarify defendant's statement. However, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was erroneously applied to buccal swab evidence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Tyler, 06PDJ105, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 11, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Wartena, Case No. 06SA232, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In applying Colo. Rev. Stat. § 16-3-309 (2006) to a defense request to allow videotaping of consumptive DNA testing, a court abused its discretion when it committed to ordering suppression of the test results that had not yet been conducted if the agency refused to permit videotaping and the prosecution refused to pay a defense expert's expense. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Sledge, 07PDJ018, SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 17, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.