 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Sigley, No. 01PDJ081.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, April 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLP, Case No. 01SA56,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sportsmen's club's proposed artificial recharge activities involving the movement of underground water into, from, or through aquifers underlying surface of privately-owned property did not constitute a trespass or require just compensation.
|
|||||
| Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of Golden, Case No. 01SA105.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A decades' previous change proceeding which litigated two water rights decrees held by a city, did not preclude equitable consideration of whether the irrigation of additional lawn acreage constituted an impermissible expansion of water use.
|
|||||
| Gall v. Jamison (In re Gall), Case No. 00SA81,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court determined that if an expert considered work product material, that material lost its privileged status, and was discoverable by the opposing party in a medical malpractice suit brought by parents on behalf of their child.
|
|||||
| In re Title, Nos. 01SA409 & 01SA410,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The titles of two voter initiatives were misleading and confusing, because they did not sufficiently inform the voters of the parental-waiver process and its virtual elimination of bilingual education as a viable parental and school district option.
|
|||||
| In re Title v. Respondents: Dennis Polhill & Douglas Campbell, Proponents, & Title, Case Nos. 02SA50, 02SA52, and 02SA71.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A voter initiative purporting to deal with procedural aspects of the right to petition which drastically altered the substance of measures on the ballot was unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| People v. Rath, Case No. 99SC916,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of prior misconduct by defendant was properly admitted by the trial court when the testimony of other women during defendant's rape trial established a pattern, and was more probative than prejudicial.
|
|||||
| Tattered Cover v. City of Thornton, Case No. 01SA205,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City failed to demonstrate that its need for a bookstore's customer purchase record was sufficiently compelling to outweigh the harm that would have been caused to constitutional interests, if search warrant were executed.
|
|||||
| Dyrkopp v. Denver Sch. Dist. # 1, CASE NO. 01SC336,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
