 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Dixon, Case No. 06SA58,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a district court's minute entry did not mandate, or even suggest, that the Colorado Department of Corrections apply presentence confinement credit to any particular sentence, defendant's request for relief under Colo. App. R. 21 was denied since there was no violation of a sentencing order under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-405 (2005).
|
|||||
| People v. Huber, Case No. 05SC40,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Blakely and Lopez, it was permissible for the trial court to consider the fact that defendant committed the instant offense while under supervision for an earlier conviction in deciding to sentence defendant in the aggravated range under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-401.
|
|||||
| People v. Isaacks, Case No. 05SC87,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no evidence in the record that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to have jury determine the facts in the presentence report that the trial court used to sentence him in the aggravated range under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-401(6), the aggravated-range sentence violated defendant's Blakely rights.
|
|||||
| People v. Weiss, Case No. 05SA227,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by holding evidentiary hearing under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-407(2)(c) and by admitting into evidence defendant's contention that victim had made a number of false reports of sexual abuse against other persons because defendant's offer of proof and evidence at hearing failed to show that other reports were demonstrably false.
|
|||||
| People v. Rasure, 05PDJ081.,
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
