 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cericalo v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA1514,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The unemployment benefits of a claimant who suffered complications of diabetes were required by Colorado statute to be reduced by half of the prorated weekly amount of his Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, resulting in his ineligibility to receive any unemployment benefits.
|
|||||
| Colo. Crim. Justice Reform Coalition v. Ortiz, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0879,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: H.B. 1256, Gen. Assem. (Colo. 2003) did not violate the single subject requirement of Colo. Const. art. V, § 21 or Colo. Const. art. X, § 20(4)(b) as it contained only one subject, the use of lease-purchase agreements to fund capital construction of State facilities; nor did it create multiple-year financial obligations requiring voter approval.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Cooper, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA1526,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court found that the mother had "attempted successfully to serve" the father, and not his attorney, with a motion and notice of hearing regarding allocation to her of full parental responsibilities, the evidence was insufficient to prove that he received actual notice of the proceeding under Colo. R. Civ. P. 5(b).
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Swim, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1922,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The designation of the father as the primary residential parent was proper pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 14-10-129 and 14-10-131(2)(b.5) (2004) where it was in the children's best interests to reside primarily with their father. The plan to move to Missouri would have substantially changed the geographical ties between the children and father.
|
|||||
| In re Petition of R.A., Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0503,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION THREE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order reinstating visitation to the child's natural grandparents was improper pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-5-211(1) (2004) where the wishes of the adoptive parents were entitled to the same consideration as those of natural parents.
|
|||||
| People v. Bryant, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0085,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION ONE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant entered a plea of guilty to attempted extortion based on allegations that defendant and another individual made threats to the victim, causing him to quit his job and move to another state. The trial court did not violate Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-602(3)(a) (2004) when it ordered defendant to pay restitution for the victim's lost wages.
|
|||||
| People v. Johnson, Court of Appeals No. 03CA2339,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FOUR, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's sentence for felony theft was aggravated by a judge pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 181.3401(6) (2004), for reasons other than the fact of prior convictions, the sentence was unconstitutional. Defendant was entitled to post-conviction relief, because she did not waive her right to a jury determination of aggravating factors.
|
|||||
| People v. Padilla, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA1546,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION FIVE, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While an inmate in a county jail, defendant got out of a locked building through a hole cut in a screen and attempted to leave the facility grounds, but was apprehended; his conduct constituted the crime of escape under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-208 (2004). The trial court properly sentenced defendant as a habitual criminal.
|
|||||
| Pioneers Hosp. of Rio Blanco County v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, Court of Appeals No.: 04CA0839,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A $ 500 penalty was properly imposed on employer in workers' compensation case because employer arranged for evidentiary deposition of medical specialist without approval from ALJ. Under Colo. Dep't Lab. & Emp. Regs. No. VIII(E)(2)(b), 7 Colo. Code Regs. 11013, employer had to file written notice and obtain order from ALJ before taking deposition.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Teck, Court of Appeals No.: 03CA2456,
COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO, DIVISION TWO, April 7, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An ALJ properly awarded judgment to state senator and his candidate committee in action by petitioner alleging that they violated Colorado Constitution and Fair Campaign Practices Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-45-106(5) (2004), because committee could accept contributions in excess of $ 18,000 as long as contributions were not made by political party.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
